<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY - E-Discovery Blog and Law Guides &#187; ALSP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electronicdiscovery.info/tag/alsp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electronicdiscovery.info</link>
	<description>Electronic Discovery is an E-Discovery Blog by an Attorney</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Timothy Hillman and the Boston ALSP discuss Rule 26(f) ‘Meet and Confer’ Strategies – Electronic Discovery</title>
		<link>http://electronicdiscovery.info/judge-timothy-hillman-and-the-boston-alsp-discuss-rule-26f-%e2%80%98meet-and-confer%e2%80%99-strategies-%e2%80%93-electronic-discovery/</link>
		<comments>http://electronicdiscovery.info/judge-timothy-hillman-and-the-boston-alsp-discuss-rule-26f-%e2%80%98meet-and-confer%e2%80%99-strategies-%e2%80%93-electronic-discovery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>E-Discovery News Feed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[‘Meet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALSP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confer’]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discuss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timothy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronicdiscovery.info/judge-timothy-hillman-and-the-boston-alsp-discuss-rule-26f-%e2%80%98meet-and-confer%e2%80%99-strategies-%e2%80%93-electronic-discovery/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Judge Timothy Hillman and the Boston ALSP discuss Rule 26(f) ‘Meet and Confer’ Strategies By Chuck Kellner, SVP, eDiscovery Expert The message is that counsel has to get a handle on their clients’ data and architecture in preparing for discovery. Otherwise, says Judge Timothy Hillman, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the District of Massachusetts, they’ll be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Judge Timothy Hillman and the Boston ALSP discuss Rule 26(f) ‘Meet and Confer’ Strategies</strong></p>
<p>By <a title="Chuck Kellner Bio" href="http://www.d4discovery.com/about/management-team/chuck-kellner/">Chuck Kellner</a>, SVP, eDiscovery Expert</p>
<p><a href="http://www.d4discovery.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/alsp_logo_final.jpg" rel="lightbox[4639]" title="Boston ALSP discuss 26(f) Meet and Confer Strategies"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4643" title="Boston ALSP discuss 26(f) Meet and Confer Strategies" src="http://www.d4discovery.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/alsp_logo_final-300x141.jpg" alt="Boston ALSP discuss 26(f) Meet and Confer Strategies" width="300" height="141" /></a>The message is that counsel has to get a handle on their clients’ data and architecture in preparing for discovery.  Otherwise, says Judge Timothy Hillman, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the District of Massachusetts, they’ll be in my courtroom “facing down the barrel of my gun”.</p>
<p>In some of the worst possible Boston weather, the local chapter of the Association of Litigation Support Professionals filled a conference room at Holland &amp; Knight’s Boston office.  At the front, were<a title="Judge Hillman Profile" href="http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/worcester/hillman.htm" target="_blank"> Judge Hillman</a>, <a title="Michelle Treadwell Briggs Profile" href="http://www.goodwinprocter.com/People/B/Briggs-Michelle-Treadwell.aspx" target="_blank">Michelle Treadwell Briggs</a>, who is a litigating attorney and Senior Manager of Litigation Technology at Goodwin Procter LLP, and <a title="Joan Washburn on LinkedIn" href="http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=25203241&amp;authType=NAME_SEARCH&amp;authToken=0j2F&amp;locale=en_US&amp;srchid=a3f88c14-a027-4ce2-8c2f-7e646846e607-0&amp;srchindex=1&amp;srchtotal=2&amp;goback=.fps_PBCK_joan+washburn+holland+%26+knight_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*1_*2_*1_Y_*1_*1_*1_fal" target="_blank">Joan Washburn</a>, Director of Litigation Support at Holland &amp; Knight LLP.  The topic of the day was “Rule 26(f) “Meet and Confer” Strategies”.<br />
Like other US Magistrates, Judge Hillman sees a lot of discovery disputes.  But he has some sympathy for outside counsel, whom has the “impossible situation” of having to rely on clients’ say-so about their systems, their <a href=http://litigationattorneyminnesota.com/>litigation</a> holds, their data, and their potentially responsive data.  Outside counsel has to come up to speed on thorough investigation, and according to a long and growing line of cases, must independently inquire and verify.</p>
<p>Treadwell-Briggs emphasized the cost-cutting opportunities found in good preparation for Rule 26(f) meet and confers.  Clients want an answer to “Why spend all that money?” when the crux of the case is about only a handful of documents.  She advises that preparing for meet-and-confer and getting agreements on phased discovery, limited scope, or targeted custodians are powerful cost-saving techniques.</p>
<p>Washburn talked about good execution and managing both <a href=http://minneapolisattorneys.com/>attorneys</a>’ and clients’ expectations.  Preparing well for meet-and-confer means that you have a well-documented identification and hold process in place, and good metrics and metadata from the collection that can help inform the likely size, cost and timing of the review.  Preparing well also means that you have a hand in how the other side is going to produce data to you.</p>
<p>The panel and audience had a healthy exchange on vetting and disclosing criteria for search and methods for review.  All agreed that if the parties are going to use search terms, they should test and vet them in advance, against the actual data.  All agreed that <a title="TAR in 2012" href="http://www.d4discovery.com/2011/12/acceptance-of-technology-assisted-review-for-ediscovery-expected-to-grow-in-2012/">technology-assisted reviews</a> play an important role in reducing the overall cost of discovery, and that sampling can play an important role in phased discovery.  <a title="LOCAL RULES OF THE US DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS" href="http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/general/pdf/LC/LOCALRULEScombined.pdf" target="_blank">Local Rule 26.3</a> in Judge Hillman’s court encourages counsel to offer, and gives judges the discretion, to order phased discovery.</p>
<p>Notably, all three emphasized the perils of client self-collection.  Even experienced litigators have difficulty getting clients to commit to a professional and well-documented <a href=http://litigationattorneyminnesota.com/>litigation</a> hold and collection, against the risks of spoliation, authentication, and motions to compel. “Just invite them to attend and participate in a Rule 16 hearing,” said Judge Hillman, “to listen in on the nuts and bolts of fact discovery.  There’s nothing like a trip to the courthouse” to get you to understand why you don’t want to “have to come back again.”</p>
<p><a title="Boston ALSP LinkedIn Group" href="http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=3830181&amp;mostPopular=&amp;trk=tyah" target="_blank"> Boston ALSP</a> is a collegial, experienced and seasoned group of eDiscovery professionals.  The programmed lunches push well beyond the “101” class.  Catching up with friends and colleagues makes it all the more worthwhile.</p>
<p><!-- PHP 5.x --></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<h4>Background:</h4>
<p><strong> Judge Timothy Hillman and the Boston ALSP discuss Rule 26(f) ‘Meet and Confer’ Strategies </strong><br />
Source: <a href="http://www.d4discovery.com/2012/01/judge-timothy-hillman-and-the-boston-alsp-discuss-rule-26f-meet-and-confer-strategies/">original article</a><br />
Author: d4admin<br />
Categories: Electronic discovery, e-discovery, ediscovery
</p>
<p>This <a href="http://electronicdiscovery.info/topic/news/">e-discovery news</a> is syndicated from e-discovery websites and <a href="http://www.aaronhall.com/blog/">blogs</a> that make their feed available via RSS. Contact us to have your RSS feed added or removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electronicdiscovery.info/judge-timothy-hillman-and-the-boston-alsp-discuss-rule-26f-%e2%80%98meet-and-confer%e2%80%99-strategies-%e2%80%93-electronic-discovery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALSP 2008 Fall Forum Nov. 13-14, 2008</title>
		<link>http://electronicdiscovery.info/alsp-2008-fall-forum-nov-13-14-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://electronicdiscovery.info/alsp-2008-fall-forum-nov-13-14-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Attorney Aaron Hall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALSP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronicdiscovery.info/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Association of Litigation Support Professionals, or ALSP, is a key trade association involved with e-discovery. ALSP is dedicated to establishing global professional standards for the litigation support profession through collaboration, education and certification. ALSP’s inaugural conference, ALSP 2008 Fall Forum: Education Through Collaboration will be held November 13-14, 2008 at the Hyatt Regency McCormick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Association of Litigation Support Professionals, or ALSP, is a key trade association involved with e-discovery. ALSP is dedicated to establishing global professional standards for the litigation support profession through collaboration, education and certification.</p>
<p>ALSP’s inaugural conference, <strong>ALSP 2008 Fall Forum: Education Through Collaboration</strong> will be held November 13-14, 2008 at the Hyatt Regency McCormick Place in Chicago, Illinois.</p>
<p><strong>Track 1 on November 13</strong> is designed for junior-level litigation support practitioners and individuals who are moving into litigation support from areas such as law, technology and professional services. Read more&#8230;<br />
<strong>An interactive executive workshop on the afternoon of November 13</strong>, will gather litigation support managers and like professionals to discuss tools for tracking projects. Read more&#8230;<br />
<strong>An open reception the evening of November 13</strong> allows all attendees to connect and exchange ideas.<br />
<strong>Track 2 on November 14</strong> is for senior-level professionals, and will delve into trends, complex issues, and creative solutions in the litigation support profession now and for the foreseeable future. Read more&#8230;<br />
Top solution providers also will be on hand to provide information and demonstrations of the latest tools used in the litigation support arena.</p>
<p>Get the latest event details <a href="http://www.alsponline.org/Education/ALSP2008FallForum/tabid/291/Default.aspx">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electronicdiscovery.info/alsp-2008-fall-forum-nov-13-14-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

