<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY - E-DISCOVERY LAW GUIDES, BLOG &#38; FORUM &#187; California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://electronicdiscovery.info/tag/california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://electronicdiscovery.info</link>
	<description>Electronic Discovery is an E-Discovery Blog, Forum, E-Discovery Jobs Hub, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:57:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Schwarzenegger Vetoes California E-Discovery Bill</title>
		<link>http://electronicdiscovery.info/schwarzenegger-vetoes-california-e-discovery-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://electronicdiscovery.info/schwarzenegger-vetoes-california-e-discovery-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 21:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schwarzenegger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://electronicdiscovery.info/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed a bill that would have established e-discovery rules for California court litigators.
The veto was especially surprising because the bill passed the California Assembly without a single &#8220;no&#8221; vote. The move appears to be Schwarzenegger&#8217;s reaction to his frustration with the Assembly rather than opposition to the bill.
Schwarzenegger&#8217;s veto included language [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has vetoed a bill that would have established e-discovery rules for California court litigators.</p>
<p>The veto was especially surprising because the bill passed the California Assembly without a single &#8220;no&#8221; vote. The move appears to be Schwarzenegger&#8217;s reaction to his frustration with the Assembly rather than opposition to the bill.</p>
<p>Schwarzenegger&#8217;s veto included language he had used when vetoing a number of recent bills:</p>
<p>&#8220;The historic delay in passing the 2008-2009 state budget has forced me to prioritize the bills sent to my desk at the end of the year&#8217;s legislative session,&#8221; wrote Schwarzenegger. &#8220;Given the delay, I am only signing bills that are the highest priority for California. This bill does not meet that standard and I cannot sign it at this time.&#8221;</p>
<p>To read politician&#8217;s response and a full article on this story, visit <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202424994210">Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Veto: A Raw Deal for E-Discovery?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://electronicdiscovery.info/schwarzenegger-vetoes-california-e-discovery-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
