The Case For Machine Coding in Document Review: A Judicial Perspective

The Case For Machine Coding in Document Review: A Judicial Perspective – 2:00 pm – 3:00 pm in Concourse E

The case for using machine coding and classification of documents in the eDiscovery review process has never been stronger.  As costs and ESI volumes continue to grow, machine coding promises faster, cheaper – and better.  Yet there remain many concerns about how to properly use these technologies, and the potential for risk when used incorrectly.  Hear what a prominent member of the Judiciary and members of the Bar have to say about the promising future – and their concerns for reaching it.

Speakers:

Honorable Andrew J. Peck

Ed Larkin, Esq., Partner, Venable LLP

James D. Shook, Esq., Director of Compliance and eDiscovery team EMC

RSVP and reserve your session seat @ EMC’s LegalTech Sessions

Background:

The Case For Machine Coding in Document Review: A Judicial Perspective
Source: original article
Author: David
Categories: Electronic discovery, e-discovery, ediscovery

This e-discovery news is syndicated from e-discovery websites and blogs that make their feed available via RSS. Contact us to have your RSS feed added or removed.

Related posts:

1. Predictive Coding Could Doom Document Review by Humans – Electronic Discovery
2. Top Ten Tips To Become More Proficient With Machine-Assisted Review – Electronic Discovery
3. A Judicial Perspective: Q&A With Former United States Magistrate Judge Ronald J. Hedges Regarding Possible Discovery Related Rule Changes – E-Discovery
4. Don’t Overlook the Document Review Guidelines – Electronic Discovery
5. Don’t Overlook the Document Review Guidelines – Electronic Discovery
6. E-Discovery Malpractice Suit Raises Concerns Over Outsourcing Document Review – Electronic Discovery
7. Legal Process Sourcing for Document Review – Electronic Discovery
8. E-Discovery Technology: Are Humans Still Needed for Document Review? – Electronic Discovery